In full general, upper class parents spend twice equally much on their children when compared to lower class parents. This statistic comes from the USDA's 2015 report entitled "Expenditures on Children by Families." The USDA has been tracking these costs since 1960, and the trends are very telling. We are spending far more on children today than we did sixty years ago, primarily on childcare since two-income households became more standard.

For lower class parents making a combined almanac income of less than $59,200 (before tax), the total cost of raising a baby to the age of 17 was $212,300. On the other end of the economical spectrum, the costs were twice every bit high. Upper class parents making a combined income of more than $107,400 per twelvemonth spent near half a million dollars ($454,770) to raise a child to adulthood.

Interestingly, this class disparity becomes apparent immediately after birth. Upper class parents spent $20,000 on their infants during their first year of life while lower class parents spent only under $x,000.

To brand matters more complicated, we accept far more child-related expenses today than nosotros did in 1960. This is true regardless of form. We are but spending more on our kids, even when adapted for inflation. In 2015, centre grade income earners (betwixt $59,200 to $107,400) spent closer to the lower class corporeality at $284,570. In comparing, middle grade parents in 1960 spent $195,690 (adjust for inflation in 2012 dollars). And then where does this extra $90,000 go?

And when it comes to the course disparity, the question is this: On what are the upper income parents spending more? Are they ownership more things for their kids? Are they ownership higher quality items? Are they paying for more experiences, like dance class and vacations? Do they splurge on organic foods each week at the grocery store?

The fashion the numbers pause down is quite interesting. The average per centum of household expenditures that can be attributed to kids 17 and under varies by family size. For married couples with ane child, 26% of their household expenses are attributable to their child. With ii children, the share goes upwards to 39%, and with three the share is 46%.

Permit'southward take a closer look at where this money is spent.

Note: These figures from the USDA are calculated equally a percentage of total costs to raise a child to 17. That is, if y'all spent $250,000 on a child over 17 years, what percentage was put toward each category? This helps brand the figures more fair in comparing college and lower grade expenses.

Housing – 29% of total child-rearing costs

Where you lot alive greatly affects your cost of living, whether you have children or not. Yet when kids are added to the mix, the costs can balloon. For heart form earners, 29% of the full cost of raising a child to the age of 17 is spent on housing. Higher income earners often spend a larger percentage of their income because they can afford larger housing in more desirable areas.

The biggest determinant of your price to raise kids is whether you live in a rural, suburban or urban expanse. As you could guess, rural areas take the lowest cost of living and urban areas have the highest. Suburban areas tend to fall somewhere in the centre.

Of course, the principal gene in this low or loftier cost of living is the bodily housing. Property prices and taxes are typically higher in more densely populated areas. That's simply because of the market's demand—the more people who desire to alive somewhere, the higher the demand. With a express supply of housing options, the competition drives the costs of housing up.

We see this consequence in high housing toll areas such as the urban Northeast, where parents spend the virtually money raising their kids. The urban W and urban Suth come close behind, while the urban Midwest and rural areas throughout the country tendency toward the everyman costs to raise a child.

Included in this housing cost are other expenses like electricity, natural gas, water, and other utilities likewise as insurance.

Where you choose to live doesn't just affect the toll of housing. High cost of living areas also tend to pay more for gasoline, food, taxes, and other utilities. Of class, it is possible to be a lower grade family unit in a HCOL area or an upper class family in a LCOL expanse—both of these scenarios would greatly bear upon the generalizations issued by the USDA.

Food – 18% of total child-rearing costs

The next biggest expense in raising a family is nutrient. On average, about one-fifth of all parenting costs go toward food, with some spending as much as 25% of their kid-rearing costs on nutrient. Single parents of two children spent 34% since the costs were spread beyond 1 less adult.

Luckily, this expense is also variable, meaning parents can go creative and find means to reduce their spending on nutrient. TheUSDAreally classifies the choices in food budgeting habits into iv "food plans": thrifty, low-toll, moderate-toll and liberal (high-price). Depression-cost nutrient plans are typically half of the liberal nutrient plans. Every bit one would look, higher class families tend to be more "liberal" with their food budgets and oft end up spending a larger percentage of their total kid-rearing costs on food than is strictly necessary.

The age and gender of the child affects the costs significantly. As of March 2017, a monthly moderate-price nutrient plan for a one-year-old is $141.40. For boys 12-13 years erstwhile, this "moderate cost" becomes $296.50 per month; for girls of the same age, this figure is just $244.80.

Overall, a family of four with 2 children under v can await to spend $557.40 per month (on the thrifty plan) or upward to $1088.90 (on the liberal plan) to feed all iv people. For couples with two older children between 6 and 9 years former, this figure jumps to $638.50 per month on the low stop and $1273.10 on the high end. And that's before the kids attain the expense of food-induced growth spurts!

Many parents-to-be might be shocked to learn that these high figures are calculated by the USDA as providing every meal and snack at home. Eating out at fast nutrient or fifty-fifty fast-casual restaurants, equally many higher course families exercise, or paying for schoolhouse-provided meals volition raise this cost of kid-rearing significantly.

With some planning, though, it is not hard to keep these costs on the thrifty or depression-price side for lower income families. Ownership dry and frozen goods in bulk from big box stores tin can help, as can "couponing." Smart meal planning can salvage hundreds per month by taking advantage of weekly grocery fliers that annunciate certain cuts of meat or types of produce every bit beingness on auction.

Transportation – 19% of child-rearing costs

When calculating transportation costs, the USDA excludes transit to work. The child-rearing costs were only counted if a child was being transported to schoolhouse or daycare or if a child was benefiting from the transit, i.e., a mother driving solitary to grocery shop. If the child was benefiting from transportation, even if he or she was not in the vehicle, the price was divided with 50% going toward the parents.

Equally kids get older, their transportation costs increment. They become involved in more activities and have more places to go. College class families tend to have more activities to which they taxi the kids, which tin can increase their share of transportation costs.

Once the kids are old enough to bulldoze, the figures likewise include the toll of their car, gas and automotive insurance. Since higher form families are more probable to provide a motorcar and insurance, these costs tend to exist college than they are for lower income families.

Not all transportation costs are associated with cars. Many lower class families, peculiarly in urban and well-developed suburban areas, rely on public transit. Overall, public transportation costs are lower than those of maintaining and driving a vehicle—for one person. When older kids are accept transit, the costs are multiplied, and lower income families can cease upwards paying more than for transportation for their kids than higher class parents.

Clothing –  5% to vii% of total child-rearing costs

Both higher and lower income families spent well-nigh the same share of their child-rearing upkeep on vesture, averaging 6%. This means a centre income family averaging $70,000 per year in income would spend $4200 per year on clothes for one child. A lower income family unit at $xl,000 per year would spend $2,400, and a higher class family earning $110,000 annually would spend nigh $half-dozen,600.

The USDA includes all ages in this average, and this is skewed by the fact that they count disposable diapers as clothing. Still, the number is quite interesting because the per centum is nearly identical beyond all classes.

To review – Housing, food, clothing and transportation alone now business relationship for approximately 72% of all money spent raising a kid from birth to 17 years old.

Kid Care and Education

The price of child care in 1960, when many mothers were stay-at-dwelling, wasnegligible, according to the USDA. Today, though, these costs account for a significant portion of the increase in the cost of raising a child. Still, only half of families pay anything towards these categories. Families with a stay-at-home mom or country assist toward child intendance often pay cypher. (This adding does not include incidental expenses like infrequent babysitting; instead, it focuses on regular, recurring costs.)

College form families are more probable to transport their children to private schools, which incurs an additional expense via tuition. Dual-income households in which both parents work are more likely to incur daycare costs for children nether 5, but the need for this expense is shared across all economical classes. Withal, college course parents are also likely to spend more on daycare costs since they tend to live in higher cost of living areas.

Healthcare

Children's healthcare costs as a percentage of family spending has doubled since the USDA started tracking these numbers in 1960.

For a family of four with two parents and ii children, the share of full child-rearing costs spent on healthcare ranges from fifteen% to xx%. The higher the income, the higher percentage of the full budget was spent on children'south healthcare via insurance payments and out-of-pocket costs.

Lower class families frequently receive more government assistance and more reasonable insurance rates, allowing them to lower their percent of healthcare-related costs.

Number of Children

While the overall toll of raising a family increases with each boosted child, the expense per child decreases with each additional child. This is because siblings are able to take advantage of the same housing, utilities, toys, and clothing. They can share bedrooms, as well. Even nutrient can be cheaper per person with more children since bulk deals are widely available at big box stores.

In addition, childcare, education and even healthcare costs can be decreased per child with sibling or family unit discounts. Even having an older child available to scout a younger sibling can reduce overall costs.

The USDA found that families with iii or more children had costs per child reduced by 22% compared to two-kid families. Again, the total dollar amount is, of course, college—just the breakdown means adding a second kid doesn't necessarily double child-related expenses.

Optional, Discretionary Expenses

With all of the above 'essential' categories, a child tin be raised to the historic period of 17 with housing, nutrient, healthcare, instruction, transportation and child intendance included. As you have seen, in that location are already significant differences between what college form and lower class families spend on these essentials, both as whole numbers and as percentages of their total child-rearing costs. Many of these price differences can exist attributed to residing in a high or low cost of living surface area, with the exception of priate education and food, which can vary quite a lot based on private choices.

However, the rest of the cost deviation may be attributed to optional expenses. These tin can include extracurricular classes, sports, vacations, and other not-essentials. Higher form families are more likely to classify a generous portion of their budget to these kinds of experiences. For lower course families, they may pay zero percent toward these extras, simply centre and high class families may pay around 5% to ten% of all of their child-related costs toward discretionary expenses.

College Costs

Remember that the thou sums of raising a baby to the age of 17 was $212,300 for lower class families and $454,770 for higher class families. These numbers practice not include the toll of college or other post-secondary teaching, for which many parents pay. Including these numbers could raise the costs by tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Lower income students may authorize for Pell grants, demand-based scholarships and subsidized loans to help cover the cost of their omnipresence. They may also exist more than likely to pick schools that are more affordable, typically in-state public universities or customs colleges. Thus, lower class parents tend to pay less, both equally a whole number and as a per centum of their total kid-rearing costs, for their children's college education.

On the other end, higher income students often do not qualify for any grants or subsidized loans. They must pay for the cost of higher education through unsubsidized loans and, in many cases, assist from their parents. They may also be able to attain merit-based scholarships. Thus, a higher class family will pay more than every bit a percentage of their spending toward their children's post-loftier school education.

Lost Opportunity Cost

There is no doubt that having children tin can put a damper on career opportunities that, over time, could provide higher income. Parents sometimes forego working late, take leaves of absence, or turn down jobs with more than responsibilities in guild to requite their best care toward their children.

Stay-at-home moms, in particular, struggle with this lost opportunity price. They may spend years at dwelling, which affects their ability to build up career feel.

The USDA does not calculate this cost, just it is a existent business concern for many families. This lost income becomes a double striking when combined with the increase costs associated with having kids.

The Final Verdict

The cost difference between raising an upper form baby versus a lower class baby comes down to a few main factors:

  • Where you live (HCOL or LCOL expanse)
  • Whether both parents piece of work
  • How well you upkeep at the grocery shop
  • How much you spend on discretionary categories

While raising kids is more expensive than ever, parents of all economic classes can do good from smart budgeting. Many parents even find they have a net financial proceeds after certain tax benefits are applied.

Proceed in listen that the USDA performs these studies as a survey. They but acquire how much, on average, families areactually spending, and non necessarily what they could be spending with some savvy, money-saving tricks. So there is e'er hope to spend quite a fleck less than what the USDA reports information technology costs.

Throwing a Gender Reveal Party? Run across What We Carry Below!